Free
College Football & NFL Picks!
By
Football Forecasters
"It
is good to see, but better to foresee" --confucius
Washington
W
NFL A
Play: Jacksonville
L
Last
weeks A
Plays go 3 - 1 For 75%
All
A & B picks are 68 - 43 YTD for
61%!
Scroll down for more
picks & analysis
Update 10/26/02 Difference
between a tout and a handicapper An article with very good points to
make regarding questionable services - and how to recognize them. Beware
of services that use a "monitoring service" to substantiate their
claims. Legitimate claims of a high winning percentage will always be
transparent to the visitors of an honest enterprise; For
pay-for-play sites, this is accomplished by simply releasing the service play after the ball is
kicked-off. If a service gives an excuse why they cannot release their plays
after kick off... run baby. In my opinion most "monitoring" services have an
"incestual relationship" with one or more of the services they claim
to be monitoring.
Update 10/22/02 For
statistical purposes we put last Sundays KC game down as a push.
Personally we liked it on the ML (and almost got it). But for record keeping we
took the FG, and according to several of you, you found a better number than
that.
Ten College picks this week....who
the hell does 10 key picks for Saturday and wins like we do?
Nobody. But lest I get to full of myself, I'm going to visit our
picks page from two weeks ago.... :)
Update 10/21/02 Take an
Early Look at games where the line may move soon (cause we just hit em :)
Texas A&M, SDSU, Tennessee
Peace & Prosperity to all,
Footballforecasters
**************************************************************************
MISSION STATEMENT: We give our NFL
football picks against the Vegas line, and College football picks against Vegas odds
every week. Be aware that this is a dynamic site, we actively upgrade/downgrade
the selections through out the week. Check in by the middle of the
week for a listing of games we have selected, AND be sure to check in before game time, as
very often one or both of us will zone in on a play the day before kick-off. We'll
make 1-15 combined College and Pro football picks a week. We do not promise to pick 100%
winners. However, historically we will pick a majority of winners over the course of the
year. Expectations are too pick a simple majority, a 54-66%
winning ratio is a realistic goal. You will serve as our sports
monitor, all of our picks will be stored on a weekly basis in the "Past Picks"
link at the bottom of this page. A free Message
Board is provided primarily to assure you of our credibility (or to vent
if you feel the need). If you have a
question about a pick result, post it on the board (or e-mail us). This page is a
no-nonsense banner free
site. We don't share or sell e-mail lists. We don't recommend a service or affiliate with
casinos -- it's just you and us baby.
Two seasons ago I received an e-mail saying he "needed a
winner", asking on a scale of 1-10
"how strong" our A+ play was this week. I replied that it's
wrong about 30% of the time--so it must be a "7". Unfortunately
that weeks play was in the 30% category. Folks there's no such thing as a
lock--if you need one then you're in the wrong place and playing the wrong game. I strongly
recommend a short read on Money Management linked via "Vegas Tips" at
the bottom of this page.
FootballForecasters
**************************************************************************
We are monitored by YOU. You can contact us by e-mail, or post to the message board linked
at the bottom of this page. We will continue to give our best
effort to maintain the high standard of success we have come to enjoy.
|
2002 Year To Date Statistical record (ATS) |
|
|
| 2002 |
WON |
LOST |
PCT% |
| A+ Play |
5 |
2 |
71% |
| A Plays |
10 |
10 |
50% |
| B Plays |
55 |
33 |
63% |
| Total |
70 |
45 |
61% |
**************************************************************************
NFL & NCAA Opinions Free, courtesy of Footballforecasters.
Strictly for entertainment and discussion purposes only :)
A rated
games are plays that we feel very strongly about.
B rated
games are plays we feel pretty good about.
NCAA 10/19/02 "A"
rated plays
| Team |
W/L |
comments
|
| @Colorado St |
W |
We really like the Rams this Thursday. BYU looked good early in the
season but they haven't been the same since. The Rams will be able
to move the ball at will. Rams are slightly better statistically in
every key offensive and defensive category, and have played the
tougher schedule by far. Sapp will have a big day running on a Cougar
front that has been weak stopping the run. BYU is playing their 5th of
6 on the road, and this one is a short week coming off a humiliating
homecoming loss to another running team, UNLV. The scorecast model
shows BYU covering, however the scorecast is only a reference tool. If
computers could "pick" winners, Vegas would already be doing it,
and the human element would be diminished. If we could only play
one game this week, this would be it. A+
Play
|
| @Bowling Green |
L |
Al's Pounder The Falcons have been laying the wood on
opponents this year. They have the ability to score in
bunches. Al says BG will score 50 something while the
Cardinals might get 20. BG enjoys a major unit to unit advantage
with a rush attack that is averaging 5.6 ypc and 251 ypg, going against a
defense giving up 4.7 ypc and 177 ypg. This one could get uugggly.
Falcons by 5 td's. A Play
|
| @Idaho (+) |
W |
We see an upset. Both teams have played a tough schedule and
neither has done well against upper echelon competition. Idaho and MTS
scored 128 points in this contest last year. This time the game is in
Idaho and the Vandals are off a bye. With Lindgren throwing they have been
able to move the ball through the air against everybody. On the other side
MTS is playing their 3rd of 4 on the road. If the Vandals do fall behind
they have the kind of attack that can put them right back in the game. We
like the Vandals to win out right and are getting points. A Play
|
B rated plays:
| Team |
W/L |
comments |
| @Texas A&M |
L |
What do we need to say about this matchup? Nebraska is living on
it's reputation, things are not going well in Lincoln and we're going to
capitalize on it till the oddsmakers catch up to us. Frank Solich just
hasn't brought in the athletes that Nebraska is used to having. The Aggies
have a very good defense, especially against the run, that will frustrate the only weapon the
Huskers have. A&M by 21
|
| @Tulane |
W |
Man this one could get ugly too. Tulane will be throwing at a
secondary that is giving up 9.4 ypp and 196 ypg. Navy's run defense is
giving up 5 ypc and 252 ypg. That's terrible news going against a
team on the road that likes to light it up. SOW and situation edge to the
Green Wave. B+ Play
|
| Iowa (+) |
W |
Michigan really hasn't been playing that well. They were lucky to get the
W at Purdue, getting a touchdown call (from infamous big ten officials)
where replays show the receiver was out of bounds. Iowa has a
stifling run defense, holding opponents to 2 ypc! While they have been
able to grind it out on the ground at 5.3 ypc and 220 ypg. This is
just the type of unit to unit strengths we like to see when taking a road
dog.
|
| @Kentucky(+) |
L |
Our scorecasting model has the Wildcats winning this game outright. There
are no significant unit to unit advantages to either side. The Dawgs do
have a superior defense as a whole, on the other hand Georgia will be
missing 3 starters on the offensive side of the ball. Kentucky has been
playing great as a dog and we think this one will be competitive. Since
the scorecasting model predicts the outright upset by a td, we're going to
jump on the points.
|
| Air Force |
L |
Falcons option should be tough for Cowboys to handle. We considered this
as a A play but not sure how the Flyboys will react to their first loss.
They have the tools to embarrass Wyoming.
|
| @San Jose St (+) |
L |
No unit to unit edges here for the Spartans to exploit. The Broncos are superior
at every unit match-up. However this is only the Spartans 2nd home game of the
year, and the third road game on grass this season for the Bronco's, a
situation where they have not yet covered the spread this year. We think both
teams will be able to score, however SJS will stay within the large number,
we're going to wait on this till kickoff, because we think it mqy go to 17, where
we're going to bite hard.
|
| @San Diego St |
W |
Despite winning last week the Rebels are giving up more points than their
scoring. We don't see them getting it together against a team that is
really playing inspired ball. The Aztecs are great at airing it out - to
the tune of 7.8 ypp and 351 ypg. They have the ability to
score quickly in the event they fall behind. Cannot say the same for UNLV.
SDSU should win comfortably and we don't mind laying the small number.
|
| @Arizona St |
W |
There could be a lot of points put up in this one. Both teams have very
good pass attacks, but the Sun Devils are well balanced, as they run for
over 100 ypg and pass for 300 ypg. The Huskies are only averaging 2.7 ypc
and 88 ypg on the ground - not good numbers for a team playing on the
road. The 'Devils have a stifling run Dee and a better than average pass
defense. We see them winning by no less than 10.
|
ALSO LIKES: Tennessee, Auburn,
WSU, W. Virginia, Penn St
NFL
10/27/02
"A" rated play
| |
W/L |
Comments |
| @Jacksonville
|
L |
Jacksonville is a different team with Brunell in the lineup, and he
returns this week.
This one is a key division contest for Jacksonville, who are thinking
about the playoffs. They will be focused coming off consecutive losses
(w/o Brunell). Fred Taylor is running well, as the Jags are averaging 141
ryg at 4.6 ypc, while the Texans are giving up 122 ryg at 4.3
ypc, a significant strength on weakness (SOW) advantage to the
Jags. Houston is playing 1st back to back roadie this year.
The Texans have given up 40 sacks in just 6 games! When they do fall
behind they simply do not have the pass attack to catch up. Our scorecast
model, which factors in home and away tendencies, has the Jags
winning by 13; With major SOW and situational advantages favoring the
Jags, we think this one has the potential to be a very dominating victory
for Jacksonville. Jags by 17 A
Play
|
B rated plays:
| Team |
W/L |
Comments |
| @Washington
(+)
|
W |
Late
Update Washington enjoys some match-up advantages over
Indianapolis. The Redskins have a talented and deep secondary; They also
have quick linebackers which should help against EJ receiving out of the
back field. We think the Skins will be able to establish control on the
ground by going straight ahead with their strong O-line, going against a
smallish but quick Colt defensive line. |
| Atlanta
(+)
|
W |
New
Orleans off big emotional win against San Fran and is now rated #1 in
most power polls. That doesn't bode well for the Saints, as teams have
not been holding that honor for consecutive
weeks.... Atlanta has a long history of playing the Saints tough in New
Orleans. Falcons have a solid defense with a good secondary, and Reeves is a
prime time coach. We think this one will be very competitive, it should
be decided by a field goal. |
| Tampa
Bay
|
L |
Poor
Carolina. Panthers, who were playing well, just are not the same
without starting QB Rodney Peete (lost for season). On the other hand
the Buc's, off a non-division loss, still have playoff aspirations. The
Buc's will keep Carolina to single digits on the scoreboard - and it
doesn't matter which Johnson starts at QB for Tampa. We're being
asked to lay an even TD, but we'll bite anyway. |
ALSO LIKES: Philadelphia,
NYJ, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, Cincinnati,
New England
FF's
NFL Picks
Return
to Football Forecasters Home Page
All
information on this site is for entertainment purposes only ;) and is not
intended to violate any local, state, or federal laws.
Football
Forecasters is not a copyright - feel free to steal, plagiarize, copy or
reproduce our material as you like :)
Football
Forecasters: produced by Kurt Schumacher & Allen Glover
Football
Forecasters Free NFL & College Football Pick's Page